Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kumpf v. United Telephone Co. of the Carolinas, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 3, 1993No. 2005Published

1Concurrence

Littlejohn, Associate Judge:

I concur with the majority’s holding that the evidence supported the jury’s finding that United’s “Your Special Duties” booklet altered Kumpf s otherwise at-will employment status, under Small v. Springs Industries, Inc., 292 S.C. 481, 357 S.E. (2d) 452 (1987). I also concur with the majority that the disclaimer in the booklet was not conspicuous.

However, I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority’s decision which affirms the trial judge’s denial of United’s directed verdict motion. I would hold that the “conflicts of interest” clause was unambiguous,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Jordan v. Security Group, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. HOPE PETTY MOTORS PF COLUMBIA, INC. v. HyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Bates v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API