Sarcuni v. bZx DAO
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTIAN SARCUNI, et al., on Case No.: 22-cv-618-LAB-DEB behalf of themselves and other 12 similarly situated, ORDER: 13 Plaintiffs, 1) DENYING IN PART AND 14 v. GRANTING IN PART MOTION 15 TO DISMISS, [Dkt. 27]; bZx DAO, et al, 16 Defendants. 2) DENYING MOTION TO 17 STRIKE, [Dkt. 27]; and 18 3) DENYING MOTION TO 19 DISMISS, [Dkt. 31] 20 21 In what appears to be a case of first impression, nineteen named Plaintiffs 22 brought this putative class action against Kyle Kistner, Tom Bean, bZeroX LLC, 23…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.