Legal Opinion

Sarcuni v. bZx DAO

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 27, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00618Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTIAN SARCUNI, et al., on Case No.: 22-cv-618-LAB-DEB behalf of themselves and other 12 similarly situated, ORDER: 13 Plaintiffs, 1) DENYING IN PART AND 14 v. GRANTING IN PART MOTION 15 TO DISMISS, [Dkt. 27]; bZx DAO, et al, 16 Defendants. 2) DENYING MOTION TO 17 STRIKE, [Dkt. 27]; and 18 3) DENYING MOTION TO 19 DISMISS, [Dkt. 31] 20 21 In what appears to be a case of first impression, nineteen named Plaintiffs 22 brought this putative class action against Kyle Kistner, Tom Bean, bZeroX LLC, 23…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API