Legal Opinion

Cowperthwaite v. Wallworth

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 20, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The motions which have been made herein raise the inquiry whether this court can properly proceed with the cause without the United States being made a party defendant under congressional authorization.

The bill asserts that defendant's building as now constructed interferes with the passage of light and air through certain windows in the westerly end of complainant's building, and prays for a mandatory injunction requiring defendant to remove so much of his building as will restore former conditions. The easement of light and air which the bill seeks to protect is alleged to have arisen…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Belknap v. SchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API