Devaney v. Board of Zoning Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
In the view we take of the principal issue, the result will be the same whether we deny the motion for permission to file a motion to erase or the motion to erase. We choose to deal directly with the motion to erase the appeal.
The action came to the Court of Common Pleas as an appeal by certain property owners from a decision of the board of zoning appeals of New Haven permitting Vito Migliaro to use, for a restaurant, the lower floor of a building in a Residence B district. The court sustained the appeal. Migliaro filed an appeal to this court from that judgment. The plaintiffs seek to have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Leavitt v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Jones v. HerbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Cowperthwaite v. WallworthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tazza v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kuehne v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Fong v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hillcroft Partners v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.