Legal Opinion

Healy v. Taylor

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

— Respondents move to dismiss the appeal in this cause on the ground that an undertaking on appeal was not given as required by C. S., sec. 7153. It is conceded that the only undertaking given was executed on December 30, 1922, and that the notice of appeal was served on respondents on February 16, 1923, and filed on February 20, 1923. C. S., sec. 7153, provides that an appeal is taken by filing with the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order appealed from is entered a notice stating the appeal from the same, or some specific part thereof, and serving a similar notice on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. LowenbergIdaho Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Wilson v. BartlettIdaho Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People's Savings & Trust Co. v. RaylIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Isaak v. JourneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Mullins v. WebbOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Fisher v. BylundUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API