Legal Opinion

Rice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2017No. ED 104181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Mary K. Hoff, Judge

Michael D. Rice (“Movant”) appeals from the Judgment of the motion court (“Judgment”) denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief (“Amended Motion”) without an evidentia-ry hearing. Because the record is incomplete in that it does not note the date Movant’s attorney was appointed, we reverse and remand.

Factual and Procedural Background

Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of forcible rape (in violation of Section 566.030 RSMo 2000 1), forcible sodomy (Section 566.060), kidnapping (Section 565.110), and second-degree assault (Section…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. Travis M. Stanley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steele v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API