Thames v. State

Erom a judgment of conviction for a violation of the Prohibition Law, defendant appealed.

The record proper appears regular in all things. The court’s rulings were invoked in but few instances, and no charges were refused to defendant.

The evidence was in sharp conflict— that for the state tending to show that defendant was in possession of a fruit jar of whisky, at the time and place complained of, and that for the defendant tended to show that he was not in possession of the whisky and that he did not throw it upon the ground when he discovered the officers. The conflict in evidence presented…