Legal Opinion

People v. Odom

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1965No. Crim. No. 9526PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before us for the second time by reason of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Griffin v.California, 380 U.S. 609 [85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106], holding invalid, under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, article I, section 13, of the state Constitution, which permitted comment on an accused's failure to testify on his own behalf.

The principal issues are whether defendants were entitled to separate counsel at their trial and whether comment by the prosecution on Odom's failure to testify was sufficiently prejudicial to require…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. MroczkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. PrinceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API