Legal Opinion

Adirondack Insurance Exchange v. Hyundai Motor America

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 16, 2025No. 8:24-cv-02475Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADIRONDACK INSURANCE Case No. 8:24-cv-02475-SB-JDE EXCHANGE et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. REMAND [DKT. NO. 19] HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA et al., Defendants. Defendants Hyundai Motor America (HMA) and Kia America, Inc. (KA), both California citizens, removed this case solely based on diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 1. However, the forum-defendant rule provides that “[a] civil action otherwise removable solely on . . . [diversity jurisdiction] may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Moore-Thomas v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Barrow Development Company, Inc. v. The Fulton Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API