Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Sutton

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 13, 1999No. Civil Action 99-573 (JBS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

The instant case arises from a series of transactions and various lawsuits dating back to 1985 and it requires this court to explore the limitations upon its ability to entertain newly pleaded federal claims relating to a seemingly endless series of matters previously litigated in the state courts. As discussed herein, all of the claims and issues within this have been, or could have been, decided in the three previous federal lawsuits and other state court actions that this estate debate has engendered. Pro se plaintiff Roy F. Sutton filed this lawsuit against…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Balthazar v. Atlantic City Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  3. Hammel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000
  4. Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. KENNEDY v. ESQ CAPITAL III LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API