Legal Opinion

Hammel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided September 21, 2000No. CIV.2:99CV44PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THORNBURG, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ timely filed objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. Pursuant to standing orders of designation and 28 U.S.C. § 636, the undersigned referred the Defendants’ motion to dismiss to the Magistrate Judge for a recommendation as to disposition. Having conducted a de novo review to those portions of the recommendation to which specific objections were filed, the recommendation is adopted. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72.

I. STANDARD OF…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel & Casino Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta Agusta Aerospace Corporation Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, Augusta, S.P.A. Augusta, S.P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Taj Mahal Travel, Inc. v. Delta Airlines Inc. Air Canada Airlines Reporting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Velasquez v. FranzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Flood v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API