Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Rieser
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New Tork entered upon a directed verdict and from an order denying defend; ant’s motion to set aside the verdict arid for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The defendant, on or about the 24th day of April, 1914, made a contract with the plaintiff for the conditional sale of certain chattels. The contract was. apparently made on a printed form and provided, among - other things, that the plaintiff has ordered “ the following mentioned goods.
“ A deposit is required on all orders. Restaurant fixtures and labor and material as per specifications hereto attached and plans approved. * * * Price Three Thousand Dollars. * * * Goods to be delivered and erected on the 25th day of May, 1915. * * *
" On failure to pay any note or cash instalment when same…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Triple Cities Construction Corp. v. Byers Machine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Rivara v. James Stewart & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922
- Shenkin v. GrantNew York Supreme Court · 1956