Legal Opinion

Shenkin v. Grant

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarcus G. Christ, J.

This is an action in which the plaintiffs seek to recover $6,500 from the defendants, alleged to he due by the terms of a conditional sales contract and a written guaranty executed by the defendants and annexed to such contract. In a separate cause of action the plaintiffs seek to recover the same amount, as the balance due on a series of promissory notes made by a corporation and indorsed by the defendants.

The action came on for trial before the court and a jury on January 3, 1956. After one day of trial, the case had to be adjourned and the jury discharged owing to the death of the wife of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Goldstein v. Brastone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Siegel v. RieserAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. GoldsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965
  2. Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Collingwood Chestnut Bar Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API