Brandner v. Agre
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The main question in this case is whether resolution of an equitable inquiry into a con tractor’s substantial compliance with state licensing requirements deprived the district court of jurisdiction over the contractor’s suit for compensation. We find that the district court had jurisdiction over the case and that transfer to the superior court was unnecessary. Although the superior court would normally review a judgment of the district court, we reach the merits of the case as a matter of discretion and affirm the judgment in the contractor’s favor.
II.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Jenkins v. HandelAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Wyler Summit Partnership, a Partnership v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., a Georgia Corporation Turner Entertainment Co., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Braun v. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Larson v. BenediktssonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007