Wells v. Frutchey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
This is an appeal from the confirmation by the court below of an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant’s husband, Clinton Wells, was employed as a lumberman by the firm of Frutchey & Horton, manufacturers of ties and props. In addition to his daily wage he was to receive one-third of the profits from the operation, if any, without any engagement to share the losses or obligations incident thereto. He was not a copartner.
When the claim petition was filed, notice was given the employers, who, in turn, notified appellant, the Travelers Insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Chase v. Emery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- McCarl v. Houston BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Catlin v. Pickett & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Hancock v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. RafteryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Shay v. North Side Bank & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Morris v. General Refining Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1936