Legal Opinion

Flood v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 19, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 9517PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

This cause came on for trial, and the Court having considered the verdict of the jury and the stipulations of the parties, finds the facts and states the conclusions of law as follows:

Findings of Facts

1. That government insurance was issued in the sum of $10,000.00 in favor of the deceased soldier, James Flood; that the named beneficiary in the original policy was Mary M. Flood, the natural mother, the contingent beneficiary being Thomas Henry Flood,.the brother.

2. That the deceased was killed in active service on January 7, 1945, leaving a widow, Eileen and a daughter,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cotter v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  2. Hart v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
  3. Joseph v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Flood v. United StateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. United States v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API