Legal Opinion
Joseph v. United States
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 1950No. 3125PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
The jury by its verdict for the plaintiff-wife found that the deceased soldier made a change of beneficiary in his National Service Life Insurance policy so as to substitute the name of his wife in place of that of his mother, herein the defendant.1 Defendant, alleging the insufficiency and incompetency of the evidence, seeks (a) to set aside the verdict; (b) a new trial. We find no merit in either contention.
The jury was warranted in finding that: (a) The insured went to Group Headquarters, Army Air Base, Columbia, South Carolina, and asked the captain in charge for a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Tayloe v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krimlofski v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
- Zabor v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1953
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955