People v. Goldtree
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the]First Judicial District, County of San Luis Obispo. The defendants had judgment, and the plaintiffs appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.:
The personal property of the defendants having been assessed by the County Assessor, the Board of Equalization added a further sum to the valuation, without any complaint having been filed, and on the same day caused the defendants to be notified thereof, and to show cause why the valuation of their property should not be increased. On the day appointed, one of the defendants appeared and moved that the order of the Board increasing the valuation be canceled, and, evidence on both sides haVing been heard, the Board refused to cancel the order.
It was held in People v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. Flint, Irvine & Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by29 opinions
- Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Montgomery v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Orr v. State Board of EqualizationIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. Van Nuys Lighting DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.