Reeves v. Thompson

The bill as originally framed sought to require the mortgagor to select which of lots 37 or 38, he intended by the general description, of “one lot located in West End Manor,” and to reform the mortgage so as to describe it properly. ■

By an amendment, the bill alleged that it-was the mutual intention of both parties to embrace in the mortgage both of the lots, and ■■ that they each were only twentyfi-vé feet: frontage adjacent to each other, and’intended.' to'be the “one lot” described in the mortgage, - and sought to reform the mortgage by so describing the property. This amendment was…