State v. Davids
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1DissentCane, P.J.
The issue in this case is whether the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe has a right to fish free of state regulation outside the Tribe's present reservation boundaries, but within the boundaries originally created by the Treaty of 1856.1 The majority concludes that it does; I disagree. The majority's conclusion is contrary to the Tribe's history and the legal effect of the federal government's allotment policy as it existed in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
There is no factual dispute that the area where Bert Davids was cited for fishing without a valid Wisconsin fishing license is outside the Tribe's…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. KneipSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife v. Klamath Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Grey BearCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.