Legal Opinion
State v. Garrett
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1992No. C7-91-508PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Reginald Garrett appeals from his conviction and 240-month sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Garrett claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction, that the state improperly excluded African-Americans from the venire, and that the trial court failed to issue findings to support an upward departure from the presumptive sentence of 98 months. We affirm the conviction, but reverse the sentence and remand for resen-tencing.
FACTS
Garrett stands convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. l(f)(i)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HalvorsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. McAdoryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.