Kino v. Randall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Certiorari. Before Judge Hardeman. Bibb superior court. April term, 1894.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
An attachment was sued out under section 3293 of the code, and made returnable to a justice’s court. At the trial the defendant appeared and moved to dismiss the *450attachment on various grounds, the merits of which it is not now material to consider. This motion was overruled; and after the plaintiff had closed his evidence,, the defendant then made a motion for a nonsuit, which was likewise overruled, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff-, upon which a general judgment in his favor was entered. The defendant thereupon sued out a certiorari, in which she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merchants National Bank v. GuilmartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Sutton v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Camp v. CahnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Hickson v. Brown, Weddington & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Joseph & Brother v. SteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Woodbridge v. DroughtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- McAndrew v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Williamson v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Higgins v. GosdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.