Woodbridge v. Drought
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint — attachment. Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. November 7, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmoks, C. J.
1. Where a petition contains several counts, it is not error to refuse to dismiss the whole case on the ground that one of the counts is bad.
2. Where the payee in several promissory notes brings suit thereon in his own name for the use of another, and the usee, before the commencement of the action, has acquired the legal title by indorsement, the petition is amendable by striking the name of the original plaintiff and allowing the action to proceed in the name of the usee. Wilson v. Presbyterian Church, 56 Ga. 554; Martin v. Lamb, 77 Ga. 252 (2); Liverpool Ins. Co. v. Ellington, 94 Ga. 785.
8.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Martin v. Lamb & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Wilson v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Lynch v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Thompson v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Alvaton Mercantile Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Rome Railway & Light Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- O'Rear v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Swilley v. HookerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.