Legal Opinion

People v. Van Wie

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1945No. Crim. 2366PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

After pleas of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity defendant was convicted by a jury of three charges of bigamy. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction and from the denial of the motion for a new trial.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment because, so it is urged, the State failed to prove that a valid marriage existed at the time of the alleged bigamous marriages.

The information contains three counts charging separate violations of section 281 of the Penal Code. That section provides that: “Every person having a husband or wife…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. GosdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. LaMarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. PriestleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Freeman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. People v. O'NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. RauchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API