People v. Van Wie
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
After pleas of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity defendant was convicted by a jury of three charges of bigamy. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction and from the denial of the motion for a new trial.
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment because, so it is urged, the State failed to prove that a valid marriage existed at the time of the alleged bigamous marriages.
The information contains three counts charging separate violations of section 281 of the Penal Code. That section provides that: “Every person having a husband or wife…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. GosdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. LaMarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. PriestleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Freeman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. O'NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. RauchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.