Legal Opinion

January v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1887No. 20165PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court of Sacramento County to settle a bill of case. The facts are stated in

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

— The first bill of exceptions was prepared in time, and properly left with the clerk for the judge. The service of the notice, which was made by depositing a copy thereof through the door into the postal-box which had been placed there for the reception of documents, was sufficient. It cannot be said that a box so clearly designated by an attorney as the proper place for the deposit of letters and papers during his absence from the office is not a “conspicuous place ” within the meaning of section 1011 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The bill as originally presented was a transcript of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Williams v. Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Winters v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Montana Lumber & Produce Co. v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Spencer v. Town of ArlingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API