Southern Express Co. v. Oliver
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Grady superior court—Judge Cox. July 3, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. Where an action against an express company was based on an interstate shipment, the validity of the stipulation embraced in the receipt issued by the company, limiting to a period of one year the time within which action might be brought for loss, damage, or detention of th.e shipment, must be determined under the rulings made by the Federal courts. Under such rulings, the consignor is bound by such reasonable stipulations. Lynch v. Southern Express Co., 18 Ga. App. 761 (90 S. E. 655); Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491 (33 Sup. Ct. 148, 57 L. ed. 314, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 257).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. YesbikSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Adams Express Co. v. MellichampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Cherokee Sawmill Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Milledgeville Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Golden Live Stock Co. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921