Rome v. Rome
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident. The jury, upon special verdict, found defendant Rowland Millard 0 percent negligent, and defendant Barry Rome 100 percent negligent. The trial court ruled that defendant Millard was negligent as a matter of law and granted a new trial on the issue of liability. We reverse and reinstate the verdict.
This case presents the issue of whether an automobile driver is negligent as a matter of law in failing continuously to observe an oncoming car which improperly enters his lane, causing a collision.
The plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Martin v. BussertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Kapla v. LehtiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Veld v. StefflCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985