Legal Opinion

Rome v. Rome

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1976No. 45444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This is a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident. The jury, upon special verdict, found defendant Rowland Millard 0 percent negligent, and defendant Barry Rome 100 percent negligent. The trial court ruled that defendant Millard was negligent as a matter of law and granted a new trial on the issue of liability. We reverse and reinstate the verdict.

This case presents the issue of whether an automobile driver is negligent as a matter of law in failing continuously to observe an oncoming car which improperly enters his lane, causing a collision.

The plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Martin v. BussertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Kapla v. LehtiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Veld v. StefflCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API