Legal Opinion

United States v. Elliott

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 13, 1984No. CR-1-83-100PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ' SUPPRESS

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the defendant, Ricky G. Elliott’s motion to suppress evidence (doc. 3), and the United States’ memorandum in opposition to that motion (doc. 4). As set forth in the following analysis, we conclude that the affidavit in support of the warrant provides no substantial basis for an inference of probable cause. Therefore, we conclude that the motion to suppress must be granted.

The factual portion of the affidavit in support of the warrant reads in its entirety as follows:

Due to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. United States v. Michael L. Lamon, Also Known as Michael L. Anthony, Also Known as Michael L. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Jimmy AbernathyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API