Legal Opinion

Redd v. Negley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1989No. 19989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of plaintiff Redd’s challenge to the jury which was selected to try this case.1 The trial court ruled that the challenge was not made timely, as required by Utah Code Ann. § 78-46-16 (1987), and explained that plaintiff’s challenge was unsupported by any statistics and affidavits necessary to support a valid objection. Plaintiff relies exclusively on the fourteenth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.

Plaintiff, a full-blooded American Indian, brought this action in the Seventh Judicial District…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SpanUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Workman v. Nagle Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. State v. PharrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  4. State v. ValdezUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API