Legal Opinion

Salchert v. Rice

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1929No. 5274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brought this action to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The amended complaint contains two separate causes of action. The first is based on criminal proceedings instituted against plaintiff in a state court, and the second on criminal proceedings instituted against him in a federal court. The district court struck certain allegations from the first cause of action, overruled a demurrer interposed thereto, and sustained a demurrer to the second cause of action. Plaintiff refused to plead further, and the court made an order dismissing the second cause of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sheppy v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  3. Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Weiser Irrigation District v. Middle Valley Irrigating Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Russell v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hunter v. Merger Mines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API