Legal Opinion
Mayberry Café, Inc. v. Glenmark Construction Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2008No. 32A05-0607-CV-396PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Mayberry Café, Inc. (“Mayberry”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Glenmark Construction Company (“Glenmark”), Edwards-Rigdon Construction Company (“E-R”), Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company (“Irwin Union”), Dan Haines Construction, Inc. (“Haines”), and Robert E. Curry & Associates, Inc. (“Curry”). 1 We reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.
ISSUES
The parties raise numerous issues, which we restate as:
I. Whether an indemnity and hold harmless provision in a no-hen agreement between an owner and a general contractor is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rogier v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bank of New York v. NallyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Walters v. Kellam & Foley, Mussett, Nicholas & Stevenson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Whitaker v. BrunnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jennifer A. Smith v. Walsh Construction Company II, LLC and Case Foundation Company, Irving Materials, Inc., Bernardin Lochmueller and Associates, Inc., RoadSafe Holdings, Inc., Roudebush Grading, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Farah, LLC v. Architura Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- McGovern v. Local 456, International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Eppl v. DiGiacomoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Reeves v. DowninIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.