Carroll v. Hastings
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent chief of police for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum. Denman, J., not participating. Memorandum: Petitioner operates a business at No. 1363 North Goodman Street, Rochester. Although a class D amusement license was issued to him by respondent City of Rochester for part of the year 1973, it was not renewed. In 1977 petitioner’s application for such a license (or certificate of inspection) was denied without a hearing and without statement of the reasons therefor. Petitioner instituted this article…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Barton Trucking Corp. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Golisano v. Town Board of MacedonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Matter of Perpente v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Perry v. BlairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marra v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- St.-Oharra v. ColucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Gordon v. LaCavaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- WNEK Vending & Amusements Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Hirsch v. HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.