Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Hastings
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 1, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We agree with Special Term that respondent did not abuse *1053his discretion in denying renewal of petitioner’s amusement license at the night club known as Petticoat Junction. The evidence established that he unlawfully used such premises to advance gambling by referring customers to card games at another location which he operated (see Penal Law, § 225.05). In affirming, we point out that this was an application to renew an amusement license, not a revocation, and that the procedures and quantum of proof required in the two proceedings…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bertholf v. . O'ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Matter of Stracquadanio v. Dept. of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Barton Trucking Corp. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lock v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Richard I, Inc. v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Valerio v. HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980