Legal Opinion
Gimenes v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
This motion is granted to the extent and on the conditions mentioned at the end of this opinion.
In this ease, in whieh the issue was joined on May 20, 1929, the plaintiff has brought an action under section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of June 5, 1920 (46 USCA § 688), commonly known as the Jones Act, claiming to have been injured on March 2, 1929, at 2 p. m. on board a vessel of the United States called the Huron, alleged to be owned by the defendant, whilst the vessel was on the high seas off Santo Domingo, when the plaintiff in the course of his duties as fireman in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Camden & Suburban Railway Co. v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mulligan v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Farr v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Heister v. Lehigh & N. E. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Vermilyea v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
- Hindle v. National Bulk Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.