Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Utilities Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1937No. 27393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be referred to as petitioner and respondent. This is the second time this matter has been before this court. The first appeal is reported in 173 Okla. 352, 48 P. (2d) 824, in which this court affirmed an award.

This phase of the case presents purely a question of jurisdiction of the State Industrial Commission to enter an award for medical expenses. The reasonableness of the fee is not contested and petitioner relies upon those authorities which express the rule that before medical services incurred by an employee can be recognized as a valid claim by the State Industrial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Okmulgee Democrat Pub Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Standard Paving Co. v. LemmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Oklahoma General Power Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Higley v. SchlessmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Frank and Sharp v. WhitingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Pine Valley Lumber Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. McAlester v. ToomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API