Legal Opinion

Henderson Amusement, Inc. v. Good

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 10, 2003No. 01-2462UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Henderson Amusement, Inc. (“Henderson Amusement”) 1 brought this action against Daniel J. Good (“Sheriff Good”), Sheriff of Rutherford County, North Carolina, in both his personal and official capacities. Henderson Amusement alleges, inter alia, that Good violated its Fourth Amendment rights when he seized its video gaming machines pursuant to a newly enacted North Carolina state law. Sheriff Good moved for summary judgment, claiming that he was entitled to qualified immunity and Eleventh Amendment immunity. The district court granted summary judgment for Good on both grounds, and this…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Layman v. AlexanderDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
  2. Hughes v. DuncanDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API