Legal Opinion

United States v. Griffin

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 13, 1994No. 89 CR 909-10Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLDERMAN, District Judge:

Approximately a year ago on June 4, 1993, this court ordered a new trial as to certain defendants in this case. See United States v. Burnside, 824 F.Supp. 1215 (N.D.Ill.1993). The basis of that ruling was that the government had violated the defendants’ due process rights during the defendants’ trial in 1991 by knowingly failing to disclose information required to be disclosed under the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 1 The facts underlying that June 4, 1993 ruling were established…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Curtis MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Kurt Henry Van Engel, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. BurnsideDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API