Schulenburg v. Vrooman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The account filed was not a true account. — McWilliams v. Allen, 45 Mo. 474. The question as to whether the materials actually went into the building is one of fact, and will not be reviewed in an appellate court. —Davis v. Farr, 13 Pa. St. 167.
1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.
This is a suit brought to recover a personal judgment against Vrooman, at whose request and under a contract with whom the plaintiffs furnished certain lumber, and to charge with a mechanic’s lien two dwelling-houses in a row of four. The defence below was made by the testator of the present appellant, F. Provenchere having purchased-the property in ignorance, as he asserts, of this lien-claim, and having at his request been made a defendant. In 1875, Vrooman being then, as for the purposes of the case may here be conceded, the owner of the land on which these two houses, and with them two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Landers v. DexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Schulenberg v. Prairie Home InstituteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Fitzpatrick v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Moran v. . ChaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DriesselIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Darlington Lumber Co. v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- National Surety Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Cole v. BarronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
- Hiller v. SchulteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.