Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 32 opinions

AotioN in the nature of quo warranto tried before Goble, J., at November Term, 1897, of Iredell Superior Court, on complaint and answer. The complaint was as follows: “The plaintiff complains and alleges— 1st. That the relator, L. Cl Caldwell, is a citizen and tax-payer of Iredell County, North Carolina. 2nd.

Read the full summary

AotioN in the nature of quo warranto tried before Goble, J., at November Term, 1897, of Iredell Superior Court, on complaint and answer. The complaint was as follows: “The plaintiff complains and alleges— 1st. That the relator, L. Cl Caldwell, is a citizen and tax-payer of Iredell County, North Carolina. 2nd. That the defendant was duly elected Railroad Commissioner by the Legislature of 1893 for the term of six years from the time of his election until expiration of his term. 3rd. That, as the relator is informed and believes, on the 24th day of August, 1897, Ins Excellency Daniel L.…

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint was as follows:

The plaintiff complains and alleges —

1. That the relator, L. C. Caldwell, is a citizen and taxpayer of Iredell County, North Carolina.

2. That the defendant was duly elected Railroad Commissioner by the Legislature of 1893 for the term of six years from the time of his election until the expiration of his term.

3. That, as the relator is informed and believes, on 24 August, 1897, his Excellency Daniel L. Russell, Governor of North Carolina, addressed and sent to the defendant, James W. Wilson, a communication in the following words and figures, to-wit:

STATE OF NORTH…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Gray v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. In Re SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API