Legal Opinion

In Re Spivey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 10, 1997No. 36PA96PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from the removal of a district attorney from office pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-66. Uncontested evidence tends to show that during the early morning hours of 30 June 1995, respondent Jerry L. Spivey, District Attorney for the Fifth Prosecutorial District, was at a bar in Wrightsville Beach. While there, Spivey loudly and repeatedly addressed a black patron, Mr. Ray Jacobs, using the derogatory and abusive racial epithet “nigger.” Because of this and, other improper conduct, Spivey was forcefully removed from the premises despite his unruly objections.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Bond v. FloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. Hoshijo Ex Rel. WhiteHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  4. In Re John M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. State v. BaccalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API