Legal Opinion

Cowles v. Dickinson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Writ of ENTRY, dated February 2, 1885, against Sarah A. Dickinson and Edmund N. Dickinson, to recover a parcel of land in Amherst. Plea, nul disseisin. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Barker, J., who reported the case for the determination of this court, in substance as follows: The land in controversy was conveyed by Edmund FT.

Read the full summary

Writ of ENTRY, dated February 2, 1885, against Sarah A. Dickinson and Edmund N. Dickinson, to recover a parcel of land in Amherst. Plea, nul disseisin. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Barker, J., who reported the case for the determination of this court, in substance as follows: The land in controversy was conveyed by Edmund FT. Dickinson, through one Pease, to Sarah A. Dickinson, his wife, by a conveyance which was claimed to be fraudulent as against said Dickinson’s creditors. This conveyance was completed by deeds acknowledged on May 11, 1882, and recorded, one on the…

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

At the time of the levy by the sheriff upon the demanded premises by sale thereof, there was a valid mortgage thereon. The sheriff offered for sale and sold “ the real estate, and right, title, and interest in the same that said Edmund N. Dickinson had on the 24th day of April, 1884.” The record title was in the name of Sarah A. Dickinson, and the conveyance to her by Edmund N. Dickinson was claimed to be fraudulent as against his creditors.

*375The tenant requested the judge to rule, that the demandant was not entitled to recover because of the insufficiency of the attachment, levy, and sale by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodward v. SartwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Willington v. GaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  3. Terrill v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  4. Hutcheson v. BlakemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  5. White v. BondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Consolidated Rendering Co. v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  3. Berry v. GatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Baker v. BradtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Covell v. MatthewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API