Legal Opinion

Covell v. Matthews

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 22, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is a writ of entry. The decisive question is whether the demandant, being the record owner, is prevented from prevailing because of a mortgage on the locus. It was decided in Cowles v. Dickinson, 140 Mass. 373, that the title of a mortgagor, although termed an equity of redemption, was a legal estate of such nature as to enable its owner to maintain a writ of entry against a disseisor. That authority is conclusive against every contention of the tenant. Crowley v. Adams, 226 Mass. 582. Compare Covell v. Matthews, 245 Mass. 135.

Exceptions overruled.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Cowles v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Covell v. MatthewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923