Legal Opinion
Warner v. the Gas Boat Bear
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided January 11, 1955No. 7106-APublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FÓLTA, District Judge.
These are actions in rem and in personam to foreclose maritime liens against the respondent vessel and to recover from the owner the amount claimed for repairs made to the vessel.
In his answer, the owner denies that the repairs were made at his request and alleges that they were made at the instance of McLean & Kristan, agents of the insurer. It appears from the third-party libel that the vessel was damaged by striking a submerged rock or reef; that McLean & Kristan authorized the libellants to make repairs, but that after the vessel was repaired, they notified the owner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Marquardt v. FrenchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
- City of ClarksvilleDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1899
- Patel Cotton Co. v. the Steel TravelerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- McCann v. Falgout Boat Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- St. Louis Shipbuilding & Steel Company v. Petroleum Barge Company, Inc., and R. v. Warner, D/B/A R. v. Warner Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Pozero v. Alfa Travel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Syndicate 420 at Lloyd's London v. Glacier General Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.