Keith v. The City of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEBRA A. KEITH, Case No.: 21CV1782-JAH-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE 14 THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO COMPLAINT 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Pending before the Court is the City of San Diego’s (“Defendant” or the “City”) 19 motion to dismiss the complaint. (ECF No. 8). The motion has been fully briefed. (ECF 20 Nos. 8, 16, 17). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court GRANTS in part 21 and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.