Legal Opinion

Acklin v. City of Inkster

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 20, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-13182PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [# 51]

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On July 24, 2013, Deshawn Acklin (“Acklin” or “Plaintiff’) filed the instant Complaint, pursuant to Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code (“Section 1983”) and Michigan law. See Dkt. No. 1. In the Complaint, Acklin alleges that seven police officers, employed by the Police Department in the City of Inkster, used excessive force to execute an arrest without probable cause. See id. at 3-4. Initially, Acklin brought this action against…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Benjamin Shotts v. City of Taylor, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  2. Bradley v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Brown v. AhmedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. Ford v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. Murphy v. MayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API