Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Beasley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1913PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.

The members of this court are unanimous in overruling the motion of appellee Beasley for a rehearing. We all adhere to our former conclusion that the charge to the jury in this case upon the measure of damages “would permit, but does not require, the jury to give double compensation for lost time.” 155 S. W. 183. My Brethren do not desire to say anything further in the premises.

However, the importance of the question involved, the frequency of its recurrence in the courts, and the status of the decisions in this state upon the point impel me to say this in agreeing to the above-mentioned…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Few v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Texas Cities Gas Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API