Legal Opinion
Grimm v. Lane
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 24, 1995No. C-1-91-011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for a New Trial (doc. 107), and Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (doc. 108). The Plaintiffs responded to both motions (doc. 116), and the Defendants replied (doc. 123). The Plaintiffs also filed a Motion for Attorney Fees (doc. 109), to which the Defendants never responded.
BACKGROUND
Danny Lee Grimm, Edgar Bennett and another inmate planned and attempted to escape from Orient Correctional Facility. They failed. As a result on September 13, 1989, all three inmates were sent to a maximum security…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bearint Ex Rel. Bearint v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Villanueva v. WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023