Boyce v. Danz
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal in Chancery from "Wayne Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The bill in this case is filed to have a certain parcel of land which has been patented by the United States to the defendant, decreed to be equitably the property of the complainant, and to be held by the defendant in trust for him. The complainant’s rights are rested upon the pre-emption laws of the United States, while the defendant relies upon his patent, and upon certain defects in complainant’s claim which are supposed to defeat it.
The facts in the case, as we find them established by the evidence, are as follows: Complainant went upon the premises, which he found unoccupied, some time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Frisbie v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Bagnell v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. CadwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Seager v. CooleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Johnson v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Detroit v. MacierMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Romain v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1878