Legal Opinion
Union Sewer Pipe Co. v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 4, 1901No. Nos. 12,348—(150)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Action in the district court for Polk county to recover $1,186.18 and interest on a bond. From an order, Watts, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J.2
Action to recover upon a bond executed by defendants to secure the faithful performance of a contract with the city of Orookston. The bond was executed under the provisions of- Laws 1897, c. 307. The plaintiff furnished material to be used in the performance of the contract, and the contractor, principal in the bond, has re*188fused and neglected to pay therefor. The complaint alleges, among other things,
“That in connection with the making of said contract hereinbefore mentioned, and for the purpose of enabling the said defendant Andrew Olson to obtain said contract from said city, he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Flaten v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Pomeroy v. FullertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- C. Aultman & Co. v. SiglingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Tomlinson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Babcock v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- J. B. McCrary Co. v. Dade County ex rel. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Dunlap v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Miller v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.