Tomlinson v. Simpson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Separate appeals by the defendants from orders by Start, J., refusing a new trial, after a trial by the court, a jury having been waived.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Plaintiff, a minor, owned S. ⅛ of S. E. J of section 11, and N. ⅜ of N. E. ⅜ section 14, town 102 N., of range 13. Defendant Simpson, his guardian, petitioned the probate court for license to sell the S. ⅞- of S. E. ⅜ and N. ⅛- of N. E. ⅜ of section 11, town 102, range 13. The court granted him license to sell the S. ⅜ of S. E. ⅜ and N. ⅛ of N. E. ⅜ of section 11. Thereupon Simpson, as principal, and defendant Willson, as surety, executed to the judge of probate a bond, the condition of which was “that whereas, the above bounden Thomas Simpson, in his capacity of guardian of Edwin M.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Deford v. MercerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Stroble v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
- Lee v. GardinerMississippi Supreme Court · 1853
- Hersey v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Jennings v. KeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simonson v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Merchants Insurance v. HerberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Union Sewer Pipe Co. v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Schuster v. WeissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. SchelperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.